Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Armstrong v. County of San Mateo
- United States v. Jeffrey Dean Ocheltree
- Houston General Insurance v. Superior Court
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,502 Howard H. Mason v. Bradley Unkeless
- Karen deLAURIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the SAN DIEGO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and Lester G. Warrenbrock, Defendants-Appellees
- United States v. Maria Delia Estrada De Castillo
- United States v. Edward J. Fisch, Ivan L. Glasscock
- Fred Douglas Davis v. United States
- United States v. Edward Ellsworth Wilson
- John E. Oelke v. United States of America, Leon T. Graves v. United States
- Edwin E. Lawrence, Carolee Lawrence v. United States of America, United States of America, as Trustee, Flora Cruz, Austin Cruz
- Robert E. Morgan v. United States of America, (Two Cases)
- Richard T. Lynch v. United States
- Wright v. Coules
- Elizalde v. Murphy
- Rowe v. Southern California Railway Co.
- Kauffman v. Foster
- Mattern v. Canavan
- Whittier v. Gormley
- Clint v. Eureka Crude Oil Co.
- Greene v. Osceola Mines Gold Mining Co.
- Chapman v. Benedict
- McKee v. Cunningham
- Brown v. Los Angeles Railway Co.
- Owen v. Herzihoff