Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Kashin v. Kent
- United States v. Jimenez-Alvarado
- United States v. Jimenez-Alvarado
- The Upper Deck Company, LLC v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
- United States v. Delgado
- Perretta v. Prometheus Development Co.
- Manta v. Chertoff
- United States v. Gamboa-Cardenas
- Schoenfeld v. Quamme
- United States v. Angelica Lopez
- People v. Monroe
- Reebok International, Ltd. v. Marnatech Enterprises, Inc.
- Doe v. Roe
- Balistreri v. Nevada Livestock Production Credit Ass'n
- People v. McKelvy
- Truta v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.
- In Re Marriage of Melone
- Thomas v. Luong
- People v. Parker
- Etco Corp. v. Hauer
- In Re Marriage of Hoffmeister
- Gingold v. Gingold
- Nelson v. Department of Real Estate
- People v. Warren
- People v. Cardoza