Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Rivas v. Ryan
- United States v. Daniel Romero-Perez
- United States v. Hugo Dominguez-Rodriguez
- Bobby Daniels v. Kuzil Ruan
- United States v. Guadalupe Gonzalez-Alvarado
- United States v. Jaime Corvaia-Hernandez
- United States v. Jose Jimenez-Lopez
- United States v. Miguel Fonseca
- Carl Hoffman v. Impact Confections, Inc.
- United States v. Guadencio Cayetano-Camacho
- Dailey v. Martel
- Matthew Johnson v. Darr
- Leroy Willis, Jr. v. W. Kollender
- United States v. Antonio Esparza-Perez
- United States v. Juan Guzman
- United States v. Juan Jimenez
- United States v. Michael Lizarraga
- United States v. Miguel Mendiola-Martinez
- United States v. Raymond Militante Rebaya
- Keith Williams v. C. Harrison
- United States v. Mario Lara, Jr.
- Century Surety Co. v. 350 W.A., LLC
- United States v. David Nuno-Garza
- United States v. Jorge Hernandez
- Kashin v. Kent