gno.law

Smith

Justice, Court of Appeal · California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One · 1900–2025

F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far

On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.

6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10

Outcomes on appeal

affirmed 4 reversed 1 other 1

Areas

criminal 3 civil 3

By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·

Analysis

No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.

Cases authored (every role)

  1. Patison v. Pratt Sac. No. 666 · 1900-06-10 · civil
  2. Sperry Flour Co. v. Strock L. A. No. 617 · 1900-05-31 · civil
  3. In Re Strock L.A. No. 617. · 1900-05-31 · other · other
  4. Arnold v. Producers' Fruit Co. Sac. No. 731. · 1900-05-25 · civil · other
  5. Hohenshell v. South Riverside Land & Water Co. L.A. No. 586. · 1900-05-23 · civil · affirmed
  6. Nippert v. Warneke S.F. No. 2042. · 1900-05-04 · civil · other
  7. Taylor v. Ellenberger S.F. No. 1955. · 1900-04-28 · civil · other