Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Collins v. O'Laverty
- Quint v. Dimond
- Banta v. Wise
- Blanchard v. Ladd
- W. W. Montague & Co. v. Leonard
- Blanchard v. Ladd
- De Haven v. Berendes
- Foster v. Carr
- People v. Tilley
- Hunt v. Davis
- Blizzard v. Drinkhouse
- People v. McFarlane
- People v. Madden
- Hamilton v. Hubbard
- Gridley School District v. Stout
- Schneider v. Market Street Railway Co.
- Loftis v. Marshall
- Lyles v. Perrin
- Ashton v. Zeila Mining Co.
- San Francisco & San Joaquin Valley Railway Co. v. Leviston
- Nixon v. Rauer
- Reid v. Clay
- Todhunter v. Klemmer
- Alcorn v. Batterman
- In re Averill's Estate