Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- County of Mariposa v. Knowles
- Western Union Oil Co. v. Newlove
- Abner Doble Co. v. McDonald
- Hibernia Sav. & Loan Soc'y v. Boland
- Alexander v. Wilson
- Kellogg v. Lopez
- Wall v. Bd. of Dirs. of Deaf
- Estate of Clisby
- People v. Sing Lee
- De Leonis v. Walsh
- County of San Diego v. Schwartz
- People v. Miller
- Pennington v. Caughey
- Cayford v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
- Gutter v. Dallamore
- People v. Norris
- Merchants National Bank v. Escondido Irrigation District
- People v. Majoine
- Thompson v. Board of Trustees
- People v. Jan John
- People v. Chin Yuen
- Payne v. Morey
- Garretson Investment Co. v. Arndt
- Mabb v. Stewart
- Cavanaugh v. Wholey