Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Grinnell v. Hill
- Hentig v. Williams
- Coats v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
- Bohan v. Record Publishing Co.
- People v. Taggart
- French v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.
- Weldon v. Rogers
- McRae v. Erickson
- Peckham v. Fox
- Carpenter v. Ibbetson
- Humphreys v. Moulton
- Renwick v. Garland
- Ball v. Lowe
- Hannah v. Canty
- Berentz v. Kern King Oil & Development Co.
- People v. Lee
- In re Hovey
- Craig v. Boone
- Dundon v. McDonald
- Palomares Land Co. v. County of Los Angeles
- Pohlman v. Wilcox
- Schindler v. Schroth
- Progresso Steamship Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
- Brooks v. Union Trust & Realty Co.
- People v. Kelly