Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Security Savings Bank v. Scott
- National Bank of Commerce v. Schirm
- Lantz v. Fishburn
- Schreiner v. Grant Brothers
- Title Guaranty & Trust Co. v. County of Los Angeles
- Mascarel v. Mascarel's Executors
- Brown v. Yarraham Gold Mining Co.
- Woods v. Kellerman
- Burr v. Cross
- Corson v. McDonald
- French v. Superior Court
- Hutchason v. Spinks
- Sanford v. Maxwell
- Buchtel College v. Chamberloix
- Ex parte Conner
- Ex Parte Conner
- Depauli v. Espitallier
- Hodges v. Southern Pacific Co.
- Rubio Canyon Land & Water Ass'n v. Pasadena & Mt. Lowe Railway Co.
- In Re Estate of Reed
- Stockton Lumber Co. v. Blodgett
- Bryant v. McIntosh
- People v. Smith
- Lauder v. Currier
- Rogers v. McCartney