Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Estate of Johnson
- Keenan v. Superior Court
- People v. Elkins
- Retes v. Superior Court
- Borglund v. Bombardier, Ltd.
- Alioto's Fish Co. v. Human Rights Commission of San Francisco
- Parnell v. Superior Court
- Smith v. Superior Court
- Depretto v. Superior Court
- People v. Cardenas
- Clark v. Superior Court
- People v. Yuna
- Jackson v. Superior Court
- Posner v. Superior Court
- Leaf v. City of San Mateo
- Leaf v. City of San Mateo
- People v. Clem
- People v. Elliott
- United States v. Ronald Henry Wilson
- United States v. 117,763.00 Acres of Land in Imperial County
- United States v. King
- United States v. Garcia
- United States v. Morgan
- United States v. Cortez
- Kress v. Kress