Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Pasillas v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
- In Re Marriage of Anderson
- Blakey v. Superior Court
- Bank of America v. Anderson
- Valentine v. City of Oakland
- People v. Samuels
- Pittsburg Unified School District v. Commission on Professional Competence
- Ezzy v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- Guelfi v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'n
- People v. George
- People v. Chevron Chemical Co.
- People v. Jackson
- Lee v. Department of Motor Vehicles
- Cory v. Bird
- Carlson v. Cory
- Estate of Gibson
- Reynaud v. Superior Court
- McKirdy v. Superior Court
- Darley v. Ward
- Alderette v. Department of Motor Vehicles
- Kalina v. San Mateo Community College District
- In Re Steven R.
- Fridley v. Eu
- Allianz Insurance Co. v. Municipal Court
- Cory v. Campbell