Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Graphic Arts International Union v. Oakland National Engraving Co.
- Brake v. Beech Aircraft Corp.
- City of Livermore v. Local Agency Formation Commission
- Mitchell v. Franchise Tax Board
- People v. Coad
- Citizens Against Rent Control v. City of Berkeley
- City and County of San Francisco v. Grant Co.
- Capolungo v. Bondi
- Lanyi v. Goldblum
- Cohen v. Board of Supervisors
- Clay v. Tryk
- People v. Forbes
- Chicago Title Insurance v. Superior Court
- People v. Leever
- Galster v. Woods
- Varwig v. Leider
- Gross v. Superior Court
- Hughes v. Alexis
- Moseley v. Abrams
- People v. Romero
- People v. Tho Ngoc Nguyen
- People v. Pervoe
- Illingworth v. State Board of Control
- People v. Andre R.
- Smyers v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board