Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Humboldt Loaders, Inc.
- People v. Lamont R.
- Lamberton v. Rhodes-Jamieson
- Taylor v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board & City of Berkeley
- Todd v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- McCormick v. Board of Supervisors
- Pecaflor Construction, Inc. v. Landes
- Kendall v. Barker
- People v. Reilly
- Myers v. Patterson
- Freedman v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
- Snelgrove v. Department of Motor Vehicles
- Seering v. DEPTARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES
- County of Alameda v. Superior Court
- British Motor Car Distributors, Ltd. v. New Motor Vehicle Board
- General American Transportation Corp. v. State Board of Equalization
- Royal Co. Auctioneers, Inc. v. Coast Printing Equipment Co.
- Anderson v. San Francisco Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board
- City & County of San Francisco v. Eller Outdoor Advertising
- California State Automobile Ass'n v. Franchise Tax Board
- Seeley v. Seymour
- Engs Motor Truck Co. v. State Board of Equalization
- People v. Inman
- Stepak v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
- Barnes v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance