Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Singer
- Hatch v. Collins
- Perez v. 222 Sutter Street Partners
- People v. Williams
- California Labor Federation v. California Occupational Safety & Health Standards Board
- Guardianship of Ethan S.
- Regents of University of California v. Public Employment Relations Board
- Norman I. Krug Real Estate Investments, Inc. v. Praszker
- Minor v. Municipal Court
- Biljac Associates v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon
- In Re the Marriage of Umphrey
- People v. Moore
- Alameda County Social Services Agency v. J. M.
- In Re AM
- People v. May
- People v. Bruhn
- People v. Rhodes
- Evans v. San Francisco Unified School District
- In Re Semons
- People v. Hellgren
- Redwood Empire Publishing Co. v. State Board of Equalization
- City & County of San Francisco v. Board of Permit Appeals
- People v. Holifield
- People v. Costello
- Richard P. v. Superior Court