Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Pietrelli v. Peacock
- People v. Woods
- Sierra Club v. California Coastal Commission
- People v. McCullough
- People v. Turner
- People v. Torres
- People v. Hill
- California Labor Federation v. Occupational Safety & Health Standards Board
- In Re Marriage of Hinman
- McKinney v. Department of Motor Vehicles
- Contra Costa Water District v. Bar-C Properties
- People v. Jensen
- Cole v. City of Oakland Residential Rent Arbitration Board
- Garrick Development Co. v. Hayward Unified School District
- Stephen v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car
- T.R.E.E.S. v. Department of Forestry & Fire Protection
- Lopez v. Civil Service Commission
- People v. Johnson
- In Re Marriage of Hasso
- Scates v. Rydingsword
- Pistone v. Superior Court
- Woolley v. Embassy Suites, Inc.
- Kuchins v. Hawes
- Kuchins v. Hawes
- People v. Harris