Smith
F--
provisional — 80% — 4.0 of 5 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 100% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 5 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
6cases reviewed on appeal
732opinions authored
1,565panels sat on (not as author)
—5 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 2014 1 · 2013 1 · 1998 1 · 1914 1 · 1910 1 · 1900 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Turner CA5
- In re Kyle v. CA5
- Timothy Mayo v. Pcc Structurals
- William Bell v. Rob Persson
- Floyd Spence v. Carolyn Colvin
- Kristina Dennis v. Carolyn Colvin
- United States v. Jesus Elizondo
- People v. Davis CA5
- K. B. Ex Rel. Kanteiko v. Hartford Casualty Insurance
- Eugene Genchev v. Detroit Diesel Corp
- Rolando Lemus v. Denny's Inc.
- United States v. Jose Castillo
- United States v. Mario Sanchez-Soto
- Withrow v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shield, Inc. Salary Protection Plan
- K Corp. Enterprises v. Fidelity Nat. Financial CA5
- United States v. Anthony Casias
- People v. Mendoza CA5
- Kent v. Lake Don Pedro Com. Services Dist. CA5
- People v. Velyines CA5
- Jancso v. Vinod CA5
- People v. Johnson CA5
- Smith v. Kern County Superintendent of Schools CA5
- In re Logan H. CA5
- People v. Tischler CA5
- People v. Teodosio CA5