Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. O'Day
- Abrahams v. Askew CA1/3
- In re D.M. CA1/3
- People v. Alejandre CA1/3
- People v. VanHorn CA1/3
- People v. Ferreyra CA1/3
- Asbury v. City of Ukiah CA1/3
- Davia v. Be Wicked CA1/3
- People v. Payton CA1/3
- In re A.F. CA1/3
- Tunucci v. City and County of S.F. CA1/3
- Darquea v. Baev CA1/3
- People v. McFadden CA1/3
- Estate of Jones
- Smith v. Yelp CA1/3
- Li v. Chiu CA1/3
- People v. Mendoza CA1/3
- In re K.O. CA1/3
- People v. Garcia CA1/3
- In re Micah Y. CA1/3
- County of Sonoma v. Pub. Employment Relations Bd.
- Marriage of Deal
- People v. Flores
- People v. Ballard CA1/3
- People v. Artykov CA1/3