Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- San Francisco Apartment Assn. v. City and County of San Francisco CA1/3
- Keading v. Keading CA1/3
- Wu v. Lian Tong, LLC CA1/3
- Seneca Leandro View v. Estate of Delmore CA1/3
- People v. Stockman CA1/3
- Bernuy v. Bridge Property Management Co.
- Seneca Leandro View v. Estate of Delmore CA1/3
- Tidwell v. Tidwell CA1/3
- Gill v. Royal Ruby, Inc. CA1/3
- Wu v. Lian Tong, LLC CA1/3
- Cotzomi v. Universal Protection Service CA1/3
- People v. Weathersby CA1/3
- People v. White CA1/3
- Bagnarol v. Bagnarol CA1/3
- People v. Girouard CA1/3
- People v. Upshaw CA1/3
- Hadar v. Luria CA1/3
- JPV I L.People v. Koetting
- In re A.W. CA1/3
- People v. Lindstrom CA1/3
- People v. Lytle CA1/3
- Wilgenbusch v. Metalclad Insulation CA1/3
- WonderWorks PTE. v. Hewlett-Packard CA1/3
- People v. Ross
- WonderWorks PTE. v. Hewlett-Packard CA1/3