Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Com.
- In re Essure Product Cases
- Timlick v. National Enterprise Systems CA1/3
- In re Essure Product Cases
- People v. Ruiz CA1/3
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Com.
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Public Utilities Com.
- People v. Salvant CA1/3
- People v. Marman CA1/3
- People v. Orozco CA1/3
- In re M.P. CA1/3
- People v. Sandher CA1/3
- People v. Gonzalez CA1/3
- UBO Holdings v. Oldham CA1/3
- Marriage of Kouvabina and Veltman CA1/3
- Karnazes v. The Lauriedale Homeowners Assn.
- In re Emma G. CA1/3
- 200 Kansas Owner v. Keenwawa CA1/3
- People v. Peterson
- People v. Pitney CA1/3
- Liapes v. Facebook, Inc.
- People v. Wright CA1/3
- Triton Property Investments v. George CA1/3
- Ainsworth v. Boys & Girls Clubs CA1/3
- People v. Gudino CA1/3