Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- People v. Francis CA1/3
- People v. Rafael B.D.R.
- Youngblood v. Logistic Resources in Motion, LLC CA1/3
- People v. Boston CA1/3
- N.M. v. W.K.
- In re Javon H. CA1/3
- People v. Jolivette CA1/3
- University of San Francisco v. Community Initiatives CA1/3
- Fair v. WV 23 Jumpstart CA1/3
- Sunstate Equipment Co. v. Eagle Environmental & Construction CA1/3
- T.R. v. Superior Court CA1/3
- People v. Potter Handy, LLP
- P. ex rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation etc. v. Sweeney CA1/3
- Yerba Buena Neighborhood v. Regents of the University of Cal.
- Yerba Buena Neighborhood etc. v. Regents of the University of Cal.
- Steuer v. Cal. Franchise Tax Board CA1/3
- Smith v. Skanska USA CA1/3
- Sweeney v. Regional Water Quality Control Bd. CA1/3
- Sweeney v. Regional Water Quality Control Bd. CA1/3
- Guerin v. IRA Services CA1/3
- People v. Reitzell CA1/3
- People v. West CA1/3
- O'Brien v. The Regents of the U. of Cal.
- City and County of San Francisco v. Bato CA1/3
- People v. Richardson CA1/3