Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- People v. Jones CA1/3
- U.S. Glass & Aluminum v. Winco Window Co. CA1/3
- C.C. v. D.V.
- Virgin Hotels San Francisco v. 250 Fourth Development CA1/3
- People v. Randolph CA1/3
- Midcoast ECO v. Cal. Coastal Commission CA1/3
- Merfeld v. Bayer Corp. CA1/3
- People v. Harrison CA1/3
- Regents of the University of Calif. v. Super. Ct.
- Taniform v. Commission on Teacher Credentialing CA1/3
- In re K.M.
- Balistreri v. Balistreri CA1/3
- The Regents of the U. of Cal. v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Estrada CA1/3
- In re A.F.
- People v. Romero CA1/3
- People v. Rojas CA1/3
- People v. Wolpert CA1/3
- People v. Montgomery
- People v. Watts CA1/3
- People v. Hamilton CA1/3
- People v. Headen CA1/3
- People v. Knox CA1/3
- Marriage of Kouvabina and Veltman CA1/3
- Di Martini v. Superior Court