Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Park v. Bradford Construction CA1/3
- People v. Sand CA1/3
- People v. Wilfredo CA1/3
- People v. Baldridge CA1/3
- People v. Millsap CA1/3
- People v. Harrison CA1/3
- Suchard v. Sonoma Academy
- People v. Amos CA1/3
- People v. Roberts CA1/3
- Herren v. George S.
- In re Jose C. CA1/3
- People v. Super. Ct. (Vandenburgh)
- Cole v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Williams CA1/3
- Russian Riverkeeper v. City of Ukiah CA1/3
- Avoyan v. City of San Francisco CA1/3
- People v. Jackson CA1/3
- People v. Ford-Howard CA1/3
- In re Alexander R. CA1/3
- Cole v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Tidd
- People v. Gomez CA1/3
- People v. Anderson
- Estate of Montgomery CA1/3
- People v. Khan CA1/3