Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Sproul v. Vallee
- People v. Reis CA1/3
- T.J. v. Superior Court CA1/3
- People v. Demacedo
- People v. Turner CA1/3
- Cocoa AJ Holdings, LLC v. Schneider
- Golden Global Enterprises v. Onderko CA1/3
- Marriage of Hart CA1/3
- Kahn v. Coinbase, Inc.
- People v. Mackey CA1/3
- Hughes v. Libeu CA1/3
- People v. Burns CA1/3
- Keck v. Odaseva.com CA1/3
- Busch v. Morgan CA1/3
- Formby v. Haubold CA1/3
- In re L.M.
- In re E.F. CA1/3
- People v. Newell CA1/3
- Doe v. Accor Hotels & Resorts (Maryland) CA1/3
- People v. Huff CA1/3
- People v. Brinson
- Wang v. Peletta
- Ceron v. Liu
- Norman v. Strateman
- Citizens for a Better Eureka v. City of Eureka