Rodriguez
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- J.People v. Super.Ct. CA1/3
- County of Sonoma v. Kelly CA1/3
- Alvarez v. Ramirez CA1/3
- People v. Knighten CA1/3
- In re J.H.
- Marriage of Ubamos CA1/3
- People v. Osorio CA1/3
- People v. Puerto-DeEspinosa CA1/3
- Estate of Alder CA1/3
- People v. Saucer CA1/3
- People v. Nguyen CA1/3
- People v. Thornton CA1/3
- People v. Rivera-Torres CA1/3
- Ocampo v. Stiftung CA1/3
- People v. Greenberg CA1/3
- People v. Batten CA1/3
- In re Fuel Industry Climate Cases
- People v. Meyers CA1/3
- In re Justin G. CA1/3
- People v. Faison CA1/3
- People v. Escobar CA1/3
- Quilala v. Securitas Security Services USA
- In re K.W. CA1/3
- McMartin-Rosenquist v. Mayberry CA1/3
- Airport Business Center v. City of Santa Rosa