O'Rourke
D+
98% — 809.0 of 828 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 67% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re C.C. CA4/1
- Felczer v. Apple
- People v. Loza CA4/1
- In re N.A.
- Paterra v. Hansen
- Richman v. Regents of the U. of Cal. CA4/1
- San Diegans for Open Government v. Fonseca
- In re S.A. CA4/1
- SLPR v. San Diego Unified Port Dist. CA4/1
- In re Eric L. CA4/1
- City of Calexico v. Bergeson
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. Superior Court CA4/1
- Sherwood v. Vogele CA4/1
- People v. Castanedo CA4/1
- Marriage of Manickam and Halagatti CA4/1
- People v. Olvera CA4/1
- Marriage of Miller CA4/1
- Dickerson v. Perry & Papenhausen, Inc. CA4/1
- People v. Khani CA4/1
- People v. Thomas CA4/1
- Paterra v. Hansen CA4/1
- In re N.A. CA4/1
- People v. Goitortua CA4/1
- People v. Hamilton CA4/1
- Felczer v. Apple