O'Rourke
D+
98% — 809.0 of 828 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 67% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Cervantes CA4/1
- People v. Gilliam CA4/1
- People v. Sula CA4/1
- People v. Garcia CA4/1
- People v. Wilson CA4/1
- Kassab v. Kachi CA4/1
- In re A.G. CA4/1
- Koganti v. PODS Enterprises CA4/1
- People v. Fontenot CA4/1
- People v. Stringer CA4/1
- Downey v. City of Riverside
- Tatum v. Mt. San Jacinto Community College CA4/1
- People v. McFadden CA4/1
- Cabandong v. Weber CA4/1
- People v. Prescott CA4/1
- United Specialty Ins. Co. v. Barriga CA4/1
- Jeter v. Callahan CA4/1
- People v. Tina R. CA4/1
- People v. Banuelos CA4/1
- People v. Harper CA4/1
- In re K.E. CA4/1
- People v. Wynn CA4/1
- People v. Ware CA4/1
- People v. Ware CA4/1
- People v. Michel CA4/1