William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- Quantification Settlement Agreement Cases
- People v. Jackio
- Woolsey v. Woolsey
- United States v. Buddy Joe Barnard
- Jaime J. Merino v. United States Marshal
- Jaime J. Merino v. Theodore Hocke, United States Commissioner, Etc., and the United States of America
- Daniel Migdol v. United States
- Stanley Halprin v. United States
- Anthony Joseph Cambiano v. United States
- John Phillip Zannaras, J. P. Robinson, Jr., and U.S. Tungsten Corporation v. Bagdad Corpper Corporation, a Corporation
- Palmer v. Boling
- Hill v. King
- Davidson v. Dallas
- Bagley v. Eaton
- Adams v. Woods & Haskell
- Crandall v. Woods
- Bryan v. Berry
- Swartz v. Hazlett
- Burritt v. Dickson
- Visher v. Webster
- Garwood v. Simpson
- People ex rel. Benham v. Williams
- Palmer v. Tripp's Administrator
- People v. Moore
- People v. Quincy