William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Vinton v. Crowe
- Eberhard v. Tuolumne Water Co.
- Moraga v. Emeric
- People v. King
- Douglas8 v. Pacific Mail Steamship Co.
- Wilson v. Heslep
- Moody v. McDonald
- Shafer v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.
- Ramirez v. Murray
- Fitzgerald v. Gorham
- Watson v. McClay
- Patten v. Ray
- Brooks, Clark & Co. v. Townsend
- Gates v. Buckingham
- Rowe v. Kohle
- Harley v. Young
- Suydam v. Pitcher
- Bequette v. Caulfield
- Lightstone v. Laurencel
- Mason v. Tipton
- Mowry v. Starbuck
- Taylor v. Hargous
- Riddell v. Blake
- Treadwell v. Wells
- Allen v. Phelps