Mason v. Tipton
LEWIS MASON v. TIPTON, HATFIELD and SIMS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Heydeneeldt (author), William J. Murray, Jr.
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydeneeldt
Mr. J. Heydeneeldt delivered the opinion of the. Court.
Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.
There are no allegations in the bill of complaint which show any liability on the part of the defendants Hatfield and Sims, and the relief sought against the remaining defendant is not legitimate, The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded. The bill, as against Hatfield and Sims, is ordered to be dismissed with costs, and the complainant, if he chooses, may have leave to amend his bill, so as to seek an account, and dissolution of partnership against defendant Tipton.