William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Martin v. Wray
- Palmer v. Cook
- Love v. Watts
- Tibbetts v. City of San Francisco
- Rogers v. Graves
- People v. Taylor
- Lawson v. McGee
- Fierro v. Graves
- Bernard v. Raglan
- Hibbard v. Chipman
- Hibbard v. Chipman
- Dopman v. Hoberlin
- Whitney v. Flint
- People v. March
- Native American Mining Co. v. Lockwood
- Soule v. Steamboat Pike
- Haight v. Kary
- Bryant v. Benicia Flouring Co.
- Blood v. Pixley
- People v. Thurston
- Arrington v. Sherry, Janes & McCrea
- Larue v. Gaskins
- Sargent v. Wilson
- Morrison v. Corporation of Bradley, Berdan & Co.
- Bennett v. Taylor