Lawson v. McGee
ANDREW LAWSON v. JAMES McGEE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Iteydenfeldt (author), William J. Murray, Jr.
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Iteydenfeldt
ITEYDENFELDT, J.
— Where the evidence is conflicting or susceptible of two constructions, we have always refused to disturb the verdict or finding. The newly discovered evidence relied on for a new trial was only hearsay, and therefore properly disregarded.
Judgment affirmed.
I concur: Murray, C. J.