William J. Murray, Jr.
Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal, 3rd District 2010– · Presiding Justice, Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin 2008–2009
A-
provisional — 100% — 1.0 of 1 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 1 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
1cases reviewed on appeal
540opinions authored
817panels sat on (not as author)
—1 merits decisions: a rate is shown from 10
Outcomes on appeal
Areas
By year: 1929 1 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Leese v. Clarke
- Smith v. McDougal
- HESLEP v. City of Sacramento
- Fowler v. Smith
- De Witt v. Hays
- Dye v. Bailey
- Breed v. Cunningham
- Heslep v. City of San Francisco
- Hutchinson v. Wetmore
- Benham v. Rowe
- People v. Tanner
- Russell v. Elliott
- People v. Craycroft
- State v. Woodlief
- Tabor v. Staniels
- Beach v. Covillaud
- People v. Wells
- De La Riva v. Berreyesa
- Polock v. Hunt
- Conrad v. Lindley
- Fowler v. Peirce
- Folsom v. Bartlett
- Belt v. Mehen
- Gordon v. Ross
- O'Conner v. Stark