Miller
A+
provisional — 100% — 3.0 of 3 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 6% of 27 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 3 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re T.R. CA1/2
- People v. Berg CA1/2
- Marriage of Besh CA1/2
- Ahmed v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. CA1/2
- People v. Putallez
- People v. Beadle CA1/2
- People v. Fonua CA1/2
- Save Mount Diablo v. City of Pittsburg CA1/2
- People v. Gamero CA1/2
- People v. S.B. CA1/2
- People v. Sandoval CA1/2
- Moore v. Williams CA1/2
- People v. Averill CA1/2
- People v. Hollingworth CA1/2
- People v. Olivo CA1/2
- People v. Rodriguez CA1/2
- Marriage of Jacobs CA1/2
- Marriage of Jacobs CA1/2
- Bayer v. Guttbinder CA1/2
- In re J.L.
- D.S. v. Superior Court CA1/2
- In re R.S. CA1/2
- Marriage of Jacobs CA1/2
- Marriage of Jacobs CA1/2
- Amitay v. Jews for Jesus CA1/2