McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Samarkos v. Goddard CA4/1
- Samarkos v. Goddard CA4/1
- Save Desert Rose v. City of Encinitas CA4/1
- In re A.L. CA4/1
- People v. Harper CA4/1
- League of California Cities v. Superior Court
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Superior Court CA4/1
- Reile v. Live Stores, Inc. CA4/1
- Sarnecky v. Fidelity Nat. Title Co. CA4/1
- In re Williams
- Dorsey v. Superior Court
- In re Wimberly CA4/1
- People v. Alegria CA4/1
- Bryant v. San Diego Electric Co. CA4/1
- People v. Gaytan CA4/1
- People v. Buckley CA4/1
- People v. Walker CA4/1
- Vacarro v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. CA4/1
- Plikaytis v. Fairmount, LP CA4/1
- People v. Sikes CA4/1
- People v. O'Connor CA4/1
- People v. Rubio CA4/1
- In re K.Z. CA4/1
- People v. Rodriguez CA4/1
- People v. McLucas CA4/1