McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Montague v. Amn Healthcare, Inc.
- People v. Super. Ct.
- People v. Consiglio CA4/1
- Buser v. Buser CA4/1
- In re J.H. CA4/1
- People v. Barnett CA4/1
- People v. Daniel CA4/1
- People v. Hardy CA4/1
- Sundby v. Bank of New York CA4/1
- In re Michael T. CA4/1
- People v. Gastelum CA4/1
- Morgan v. Imperial Irrigation Dist.
- Shapiro v. City of Carlsbad CA4/1
- In re Heidi M. CA4/1
- People v. Guerrero CA4/1
- Brewer Corp. v. Point Center Financial, Inc.
- Marriage of Schulman CA4/1
- Costa Del Sol at Carmel Valley HOA v. Mitchell CA4/1
- People v. Trayers CA4/1
- People v. Johnson CA4/1
- Kahn v. Dillon CA4/1
- Gonzalez v. Kuerbiss CA4/1
- People v. Trujillo CA4/1
- Voyager Assocs. v. Superior Court CA4/1
- Gilbane Building Co. v. Superior Court