McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- In re Ruby G. CA4/1
- P. v. Regalado CA4/1
- P. v. Shekell CA4/1
- In re E.C. CA4/1
- P. v. Negron CA4/1
- P. v. Lim CA4/1
- Crawford v. JPMorgan Chase Bank CA4/1
- P. v. Nelson CA4/1
- Colgan v. Howell CA4/1
- McLay v. Wells Fargo Bank CA4/1
- P. v. King CA4/1
- Jennifer G. v. Super Ct. CA4/1
- Ramos v. Ralphs Grocery CA4/1
- In re J.G. CA4/1
- Steward v. Bd. of Trustees Cal. State Univ. CA4/1
- In re L.F. CA4/1
- P. v. Moats CA4/1
- In re Aiden H. CA4/1
- P. v. Hamawi CA4/1
- P. v. Moreland CA4/1
- In re Alex S. CA4/1
- D.R. Systems v. Cal. State Bd. of Equalization CA4/1
- P. v. DaSilva CA4/1
- Riggio v. GMAC Mortgage CA4/1
- P. v. Ramirez CA4/1