McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases sat on (every role)
- P. v. Shammam CA4/1
- In re Amara O. CA4/1
- P. v. Arrubias CA4/1
- Reyenga v. Goyal CA4/1
- In re Tobacco Cases I
- P. v. Torres CA4/1
- Chamat v. Latham & Watkins CA4/1
- Grantville Action Group v. City of San Diego CA4/1
- In re S.W. CA4/1
- P. v. Morales CA4/1
- P. v. Behbahani CA4/1
- P. v. Sharp CA4/1
- In re Tobacco Cases I CA4/1
- In re D.J. CA4/1
- P. v. Bentley CA4/1
- Davis v. County of San Diego Air Pollution Control Dist. CA4/1
- Le Beau v. Bank of America CA4/1
- P. v. Sharif CA4/1
- McKenna v. San Miguel Consolidated Fire Protection Dist. CA4/1
- P. v. James CA4/1
- P. v. Villareal CA4/1
- In re Marie B. CA4/1
- Janopaul + Block Companies v. Sundt Construction Co. CA4/1
- P. v. Philips CA4/1
- Marriage of Mojtahedzadeh v. Farshi CA4/1