McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In re T.P. CA4/1
- People v. Rude CA4/1
- Ellis Contracting v. Superior Court CA4/1
- People v. Thamracksa CA4/1
- People v. Morales CA4/1
- People v. Palmer CA4/1
- Morgan v. Beaumont Police Department
- San Diego Housing Commission v. Public Employment Relations Board
- In re L.M. CA4/1
- County of Riverside v. Public Employment Relations Board
- City of El Centro v. Lanier
- People v. Benitez CA4/1
- Rubenstein v. Doe
- In re Gabriel G. CA4/1
- People v. Gazcon CA4/1
- People v. Kozee-Stoltz CA4/1
- People v. Moore CA4/1
- People v. Legaspi CA4/1
- Saterbak v. JPMorgan Chase
- Hendrickson v. Woody, LLC CA4/1
- People v. Kelm CA4/1
- Avista Development v. Aldrich CA4/1
- In re Christopher A. CA4/1
- In re D.W. CA4/1
- People v. Hultman CA4/1