McINTYRE
C+
99% — 453.5 of 460 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 47% of 80 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- People v. Miskell CA4/1
- Sean & Shenassa v. Chicago Title Co. CA4/1
- People v. Farias CA4/1
- Ramos v. Dillon CA4/1
- People v. Aparicio
- People v. Willliams CA4/1
- People v. Garcia CA4/1
- In re Erik B. CA4/1
- People v. Firman CA4/1
- People v. Sandoval CA4/1
- People v. Roberts CA4/1
- In re J.A. CA4/1
- State of California v. Superior Court CA4/1
- In re Cayden S. CA4/1
- People v. Williams CA4/1
- People v. Tafoya CA4/1
- In re Gustavo L. CA4/1
- In re Hansen CA4/1
- Dynalectric v. Super. Ct. CA4/1
- In re K.G. CA4/1
- People v. Rocha CA4/1
- In re Hansen CA4/1
- Monterra Homeowners Assn. v. McCullough CA4/1
- People v. Morris CA4/1
- Texas 1845 LLC v. Blue Pacific Aviation CA4/1