Linda Lopez
, District Court, S.D. California 2018–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 12 vacated 3 reversed 3 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 5 · 2026 4 · 2024 3 · 2023 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Custom Foods of America, Inc. v. California Garlic Company, Inc.
- Cactil, LLC v. United States
- Griffin v. Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Diego
- Hernandez v. O'Malley
- The People of the State of California v. Ballester
- Palomo v. Kosch
- Barnes v. Barnes
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Watt v. Block, Inc.
- Turley v. Laqunas
- Ramos v. Citibank, N.A.
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Slick Slide LLC v. Sports Inovation Corp.
- Turley v. Laqunas
- Barrios-Cota v. LaRose
- Pontier v. GEICO Insurance
- J.A. v. Luna
- Dang v. Pontier
- Dang v. Pontier
- United States v. City of San Diego
- Tan v. Quick Box, LLC
- Salarian v. Blinken
- Whitman v. CPR Classic Sales
- Cactil, LLC v. United States
- Bush v. Matteson