Linda Lopez
, District Court, S.D. California 2018–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 12 vacated 3 reversed 3 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 5 · 2026 4 · 2024 3 · 2023 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Maharaj v. Charter Communications, Inc.
- Stenerson v. Saul
- Schatz v. Flowers Baking Co. of Henderson, LLC
- Caudle v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
- Sabalboro v. Kijakazi
- (PC) Riley v. Kernan
- (PC) Riley v. Kernan
- Vanderford v. Saul
- Keenan v. Cox Communications
- (PC) Riley v. Kernan
- Domenico G Diaz v. Dean Borders
- Helix Electric, Inc. v. QBE Specialty Insurance Company
- Menke v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
- Pekrins v. Angulo
- Olguin v. Saul
- Rodriguez v. Kijakazi
- Cavanaugh v. County of San Diego
- Amend v. Kijakazi
- EpicentRx, Inc. v. Carter
- (PC) Riley v. Kernan
- Hutchinson v. Saul
- Snediker v. Saul
- Cavanaugh v. County of San Diego