Linda Lopez
, District Court, S.D. California 2018–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 12 vacated 3 reversed 3 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 5 · 2026 4 · 2024 3 · 2023 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Navarrette v. Department of Homeland Security
- Moore v. Saul
- Parks v. Ethicon, Inc.
- Acuna v. Pollard
- Morris v. Blade
- EpicentRx, Inc. v. Carter
- D.C. v. County of San Diego
- McGuffie v. Kijakazi
- Veterans Rideshare, Inc. v. Navistar International Corporation
- DNA Genotek Inc. v. Spectrum Solutions L.L.C.
- Diaz v. Capital One, N.A.
- Amend v. Kijakazi
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Diaz v. Capital One, N.A.
- Maag v. U.S. Bank National Association
- Eggert v. Berryhill
- Vilen v. Kijakazi
- Houston Casualty Company v. Cibus US LLC
- Lee Taylor v. Saul
- Valdelamar-Ortuno v. Saul
- Allen v. Kijakazi
- Vangieson v. Miller
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Bencomo v. Diaz
- Henderson v. Saul