Linda Lopez
, District Court, S.D. California 2018–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 12 vacated 3 reversed 3 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 5 · 2026 4 · 2024 3 · 2023 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Alter v. County of San Diego
- Muro v. Gipson
- Hammett v. Sherman
- Hammett v. Sherman
- Evers v. La-Z-Boy Incoroprated
- Buckelew v. Gore
- United States of America v. General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc
- Sanchez-Rivera v. Archambeault
- Narciso v. County of San Diego
- Russell v. United States
- Salinas v. IA Lodging San Diego L.L.C.
- Parks v. Ethicon, Inc.
- Mendez v. Global Institute Of Stem Cell Therapy And Research, USA
- Evers v. La-Z-Boy Incorporated
- White v. Saul
- Sibomana v. Larose
- Valenzuela v. San Diego Police Department
- Study Smarter LLC v. StudySmarter UG
- Rose v. Niccole
- Krause-Pettai v. Unilever United States, Inc.
- Parks v. Ethicon, Inc.
- Doe v. San Diego Unified School District
- Acuna v. Pollard
- San Diego Branch of National Association For The Advancement of Colored People
- Parker v. SDSU Police Dept (SDSUPD)