Linda Lopez
, District Court, S.D. California 2018–
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b's verdicts on a court's own orders matched a later appeal 76% of the time (104 of 136), graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Outcomes on appeal
The Ninth Circuit's later rulings on their dockets
affirmed 12 vacated 3 reversed 3 reversed in part 1
Each Ninth Circuit opinion that names a docket this judge wrote an order on, by its outcome; the ruling it reviewed is not always the order in the record. The order's page links the opinion.
Areas
By year: 2025 5 · 2026 4 · 2024 3 · 2023 2 ·
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases authored (every role)
- Turley v. Laqunas
- Tan v. Quick Box, LLC
- Youngevity International Inc. v. Innov8tive Nutrition, Inc.
- Sihler v. The Fulfillment Lab, Inc
- Roberts v. Allison
- Tan v. Quick Box, LLC
- Russell v. United States
- Atkinson v. Nelson
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Baron v. Staff Benefits Management Inc.
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
- Pacific Vibrations, LLC v. Slow Gold Limited
- Mendoza v. Garland
- Navarro v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
- Melvin v. Staples Inc
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
- Catalyst Lifestyle Limited v. Elago Co., Ltd
- Tan v. Quick Box, LLC
- Hammett v. Sherman
- Doe v. San Diego Unified School District
- Parker v. SDSU Police Dept (SDSUPD)
- Catalyst Lifestyle Limited v. Elago Co., Ltd
- Russell v. United States
- United Financial Casualty Company v. R.U.R. Transportation, Inc.
- Parks v. Ethicon, Inc.