King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In Re Marriage of Green
- Freitas v. Abernethy
- In Re Marriage of Abernethy
- Da Vinci Group v. San Francisco Residential Rent Stabilization & Arbitration Board
- People v. Soriano
- In Re Marriage of Baker
- United States v. David Michael Kelley
- United States v. Manuel Bobadilla-Lopez
- Hernandez v. Marchi
- Estate of Damskog
- Jimenez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
- Severson & Werson v. Bolinger
- People v. One Parcel of Land
- Citizens for Uniform Laws v. County of Contra Costa
- People v. Gutierrez
- Belth v. Garamendi
- Earp v. Earp
- Ellis v. Pierce
- Humboldt County Department of Social Services v. Paul S.
- In Re Catherine S.
- Zambrano v. Oakland Unified School District
- Dickens v. Ming Lee
- Geldermann, Inc. v. Bruner
- People v. Pennington
- McCoy v. Hearst Corp.