King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- United States v. Juan Arthur Zaragoza
- United States v. Ricardo A. Bravo
- Milos Sovak, M.D. Biophysica, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., a Corporation of the Empire of Japan Cook Imaging Corporation, an Indiana Corporation
- United States v. Li Xiang Feng, United States of America v. Chen Biao, United States of America v. Tu Yu Piao, United States of America v. Hui Lin
- Vestar Development Ii, Llc, an Arizona Limited Liability v. General Dynamics Corporation, a Corporation
- Pioneer Liquidating Corp. v. San Diego Trust & Savings Bank
- Paulin v. Paulin
- American Software, Inc. v. Ali
- People v. Shannon
- City of Oakland v. McCullough
- Staten v. Superior Court
- Ass'n of Community Organizations for Reform Now v. Department of Industrial Relations
- People v. Pierce
- Hermon v. Urteago
- Vann v. Travelers Companies
- Evans v. Unkow
- Bay Area Rapid Transit District v. Superior Court
- Hunter v. Pacific Mechanical Corp.
- Levin v. Graham & James
- Scruby v. Vintage Grapevine, Inc.
- Calderon v. Kane
- County of Ventura v. State Bar
- James B. v. Superior Court
- People v. Reed
- People v. Bekele