King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Save Round Valley Alliance v. County of Inyo
- People v. Scott
- People v. McNeal
- Ermoian v. Desert Hospital
- People v. PLENGSANGTIP
- People v. Scott
- Wachovia Bank v. LIFETIME INDUSTRIES, INC.
- People v. Thompson
- People v. Lewis
- Jenkins v. County of Riverside
- SAN BERNARDINO ASSOCIATED GOVERNMENTS v. Superior Court
- People v. Stark
- Lauermann v. Superior Court
- People v. Overman
- People v. Zambrano
- Coso Energy Developers v. County of Inyo
- Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. v. Transcontinental Insurance
- Mt. San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court
- Titus v. Canyon Lake Property Owners Assn.
- Mason v. Lake Dolores Group, LLC
- Schwab v. Southern California Gas Co.
- People v. Grant
- Davcon, Inc. v. Roberts & Morgan
- Hamilton v. Martinelli & Associates
- Elcome v. Chin