King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Group
- Hasso v. J & J Real Estate Holdings CA4/2
- People v. Sanchez
- People v. London
- Golden State v. Eastern Municipal Water Dist.
- Blythe v. County of Riverside CA4/2
- San Bernardino County Children & Family Services v. S.L.
- Roberson v. City of Rialto CA4/2
- J.J. v. E.C. CA4/2
- Ahn v. Kumho Tire U.S.A., Inc.
- Sharples v. Sharples
- In re S.N. CA4/2
- People v. Boatman
- The People v. Silva CA4/2
- The People v. Hernandez
- Southern California Edison Co. v. City of Victorville
- People v. Lawson
- Dwight R. v. Christy B.
- Daniels v. Sunrise Senior Living, Inc.
- People v. P.A.
- Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rialto
- People v. Bejasa
- Lewis Operating Corp. v. Superior Court
- Tuszynska v. Cunningham
- Gutierrez v. County of San Bernardino