King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- In Re Marriage of Henkle
- People v. Wychocki
- Russ Building Partnership v. City & County of San Francisco
- Conservatorship of Smith
- Rios v. Employment Development Department
- People v. Jackson
- People v. Stevens
- People v. Hoover
- People v. Maldonado
- Pelletier v. Alameda Yacht Harbor
- Coastal Care Centers, Inc. v. Meeks
- Estate of Wilson
- Michail v. Fluor Mining & Metals, Inc.
- Jhordan C. v. MARY K.
- Moss, Adams & Co. v. Shilling
- In Re Marriage of Rosson
- Keyhea v. Rushen
- In Re Marriage of Downes
- In Re Marriage of Delgado
- People v. Perez
- Fiore v. Alvord
- Kaminski v. Western MacArthur Co.
- Lewis v. Regional Center of the East Bay
- Carol v. Wolfe
- In Re Marriage of Wolfe