King
A-
provisional — 100% — 2.0 of 2 opinions sound, per qwen3.8-27b; would rank in the top 12% of 80 graded judges, but ten opinions are needed for a standing letter — 2 so far
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
Analysis
No analyses yet. When they exist, this shows counts of the model's findings across this judge's reviewed cases — with the court's own dispositions beside them, and only from 10 cases.
Cases
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior Court
- Annex British Cars, Inc. v. Parker-Rhodes
- People Ex Rel. Smith v. Parkmerced Co.
- People v. Williams
- Searle v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization Board
- Hamm v. Elkin
- San Francisco Classroom Teachers Ass'n v. San Francisco Unified School District
- People v. Von Staden
- People v. Gutierrez
- Jalilie v. Superior Court
- Price v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Companies
- Stephens v. Montgomery Ward
- People v. Reiley
- In Re Marriage of Stallworth
- Gray v. Kircher
- Solano County Department of Social Services v. Ron B.
- Marin County Department of Social Services v. John C.
- In Re Amber B.
- In Re Christine C.
- Harris v. Time, Inc.
- Estate of Logan v. Logan
- In Re Marriage of Buser
- In Re Marriage of Prietsch & Calhoun
- Lezama v. Justice Court
- Barnes v. Henkle