Joshlyn R. Pulliam
B
73% — 11 of 15 rulings upheld, per qwen3.8-27b; in the top 29% of 312 graded judges
On the assumption that the model is right — qwen3.8-27b reads the court's own disposition right 70% of the time, graded on a curve: A is the top fifth of the judges graded under this model, F the bottom fifth; ++ / + / − / −− within the band. How the grade is made.
57cases reviewed on appeal
17%reversed, in whole or part, of 42 merits decisions
Outcomes on appeal
affirmed 35 dismissed 15 reversed 5 reversed in part 2
Areas
By year: 2026 29 · 2025 22 · 2024 4 · 2023 2 ·
Analysis
24reviewed cases analysed
55rulings read
0rulings where the model disagrees with the court
7cases with a verified missed authority
0appellate opinions called questionable
Counts of a model's readings across this judge's reviewed cases, each shown on its case page beside the court's disposition. Not a finding about the judge.
Cases
- People v. Marquez CA4/2
- People v. Cunningham CA4/2
- People v. Boukes CA4/2
- People v. Sheppard CA4/2
- People v. Colbert CA4/2
- People v. Mendoza CA4/2
- People v. Sanchez CA4/1
- People v. Flores CA4/1
- People v. Jaimez CA4/2
- People v. Arteaga CA4/1
- People v. Lewis CA4/2
- People v. Cervantes CA4/2
- People v. Darden CA4/2
- People v. Olvera CA4/2
- People v. Torres CA4/2
- People v. Williams CA4/2
- People v. Cortez CA4/2
- People v. Parra CA4/2
- People v. Padilla CA4/2
- People v. Gutierrez CA4/2
- People v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co.
- People v. Woodham CA4/2
- People v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co.
- People v. Hawkins CA4/2
- People v. Perez CA4/1